"Corn Hooch
Discovery" Although Carroll County voted to be
"dry" a few years before Prohibition, not everyone supported the ban on the sale
and consumption of alcoholic beverages. Cases on bootlegging were common throughout the
1920s and Prohibition remained a popular political topic. An article from the May 30, 1924
issue of the Democratic Advocate newspaper
about the discovery of bootleg hooch provided the writer, Ira N. Barnes of Freedom, with a
opportunity to comment on Prohibition: |
Not very many days ago, Harry Kohler [sic], a
well-known farmer of Freedom district, while doing some chores upon his farm, accidentally
discovered a considerable amount of corn hooch securely inclosed within glass jar
containers and concealed upon his premises. Mr.
Kohler being a consistent member of the church as well as a strictly conscientious
prohibitionist, was so severely shocked and horrified at the discovery of such unmitigated
impudence, that for a few moments he was, so to speak, mentally paralyzed. But looking around, he observed, near-by, a very
large ground-hog excavation; quickly regaining his normal equipoise he strenously seized
the accursed destroyer of health, homes, happiness and harmony and forthwith dumped the
contents of the jars, one by one, into the secluded retreat of this elusive animal.
The next night following this eventful discovery,
alone wanderer traveling down Morgan Run Valley was greatly surprised to observe by the
light of the moon about a dozen ground-hogs engaged in a disgraceful tango, bunny-hug and
turkey trot to the accompaniment of jazz music, furnished by a frog orchestra from an
adjacent morass. A large number of sober
animals ranged around viewing the performance were so completely scandalized at the affair
that they were compelled to bow their head in shame, excepting a few old skunks, who had
been thoughtful enough to bring along their shock-absorbers. The potent influence of this elicit hooch upon the
denizens of the forest speaks very strongly for the ability of our scoff law distillers,
and, doubtless, will be instrumental, in the near future, of bringing them a much larger
and more renumerative trade.
Mr. Kohler retained a small portion of his
discovery as evidence, which he gave in charge of Mr. Frank Ely, our local, brave and
energetic prohibition agent, for the purpose of ascertaining its true alcoholic content;
either by personal imbition or labratorial test. It
appears to be an established fact that since the enactment of the 18th Amendment more
confiscated alcoholic evidence is imbibed by prohibition officers than ever was absorbed
by all the old soaks and rummies combined for s similar period prior to prohibition. Before the advent of prohibition. Before the advent of prohibition, evidence, as a
general rule, was presumed to proceed from the months of witnesses, but now it is poured
into their mouths. Such a method of procedure
seems to be reversal of all our olden time conception relative to testimonial
jurisprudence. Nevertheless, there is, at
least one redeeming feature connected with seized alcoholic evidence and that is the fact
that it does not cost much. There is also an
old proverb, saying that even stolen water is sweet; if so, then stolen corn hooch should
be much sweeter as well as very much more potential, both in influence and enthusiasm.
Our scoff-law distillers, long may they
flourish, |
| The strong anti-prohibition sentiment
expressed by Mr. Barnes was not uncommon in Carroll and Maryland. In fact, Maryland's
popular Democratic governor, Albert C.
Ritchie, consistently bucked Prohibition as an infringment on personal rights and
Maryland's Attorney General absolved police from enforcing the law.
|
| Photo caption: | J. Harry Koller of Freedom discovered a stash of illegal corn hooch on his farm near Eldersburg in May 1924. Historical Society of Carroll County collection gift of Henry Koller, 1989. |